lm-double-shapeSausser Summers, PC

Providing U.S. trademark services throughout the U.S. and across the globe.
  • Lower Cost
  • Faster Process
  • Experienced Trademark Attorneys

File a Trademark for $399 + $250 Government Filing Fee

Trademark Attorney Working With Clients in Los Angeles, CA

If you're an entrepreneur, you know that protecting your intellectual property should be high on your list when it comes to safeguarding your company. However, as a successful business owner, you also know the steps and costs of filing a trademark in the U.S. can be expensive and arduous.

This conundrum can be even more overwhelming for new business owners who want to do everything possible to minimize the price of securing trademarks. They try to handle complicated tasks like trademark registration on their own, which can be a big mistake - especially when juggling the day-to-day tasks of running a business. You may be thinking, "But what about those set-it-and-forget-it services you can find online? All you have to do is plug in your info, and you're done." Using pre-made templates for trademark filing can be tempting, but doing so can leave you with inadequate protection and hurt you in the long run.

So, what is the easiest, most cost-effective route to consider that also minimizes legal risk? The truth is, before you spend money on an online filing service, it's best to consult with a trademark attorney working with clients in Los Angeles, CA.

At Sausser Summers, PC, our experienced trademark attorneys can help you understand the trademark process step by step. We can even help with U.S. trademark filing, U.S. trademark responses, and U.S. trademark renewals at a price you can actually afford. That way, you can make an informed decision regarding your business without having to break the bank.

Sausser Summers, PC: Simplifying the U.S. Trademark Process

Hiring an attorney can be a daunting task, but at Sausser Summers, PC, our goal is to make the process as simple and seamless as possible for you. That's why we offer a straightforward checkout service. First, you choose your flat fee trademark service and fill out a short questionnaire. Then, we will contact you within 24 hours to discuss the details of our service. From there, one of our experienced trademark attorneys will get to work on your behalf.

Using a trademark attorney for filing in Los Angeles, CA, can significantly increase your chances of a successful registration. The U.S. government recommends hiring a trademark attorney to help with your application, and our team of trademark lawyers is dedicated to meeting your needs. In fact, we help ensure your application is filed correctly the first time so you can get on with your life and avoid legal risks.

At Sausser Summers, PC, we work closely with our clients to understand their needs and provide them with sound professional advice. We never offer incomplete services, such as simply filing for registration, because that would leave you open to legal risks. You can rely on us to handle your intellectual property matters, and our flat fee services can help protect your business in a simple, straightforward, and affordable way. It's really that simple.

In terms of filing a U.S. trademark, we provide an easy three-step process to protect your intellectual property:

1. You provide your trademark info to our team via an online form.

2. Our team performs a comprehensive trademark search. This search ensures that no other marks will prevent you from registering your trademark in the U.S. Once performed, we'll send you a legal opinion letter that details our findings.

3. Sausser Summers, PC, files your U.S. trademark application. We are then listed as your Attorney of Record on file. From there, we'll provide ongoing updates regarding the status of your trademark as it works through the registration process.

The bottom line? At Sausser Summers, PC, we give both new and seasoned business owners an easy, efficient, cost-effective way to protect the one asset that sets them apart from others: their name.

Online Trademark Attorney Los Angeles, CA
The bottom line?

At Sausser Summers, PC, we give both new and seasoned business owners an easy, efficient, cost-effective way to protect the one asset that sets them apart from others: their name.

Do I Really Need a Trademark Attorney for Protecting My Business in Los Angeles, CA?

It's not necessary to be a lawyer in order to apply for a trademark. Anyone can submit a trademark application to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). However, registering a trademark involves more than just filling out a form. It's essential to conduct thorough research, accurately identify and clearly explain your trademark to ensure it receives adequate protection. And even after securing a trademark, you've got to monitor it consistently to make sure it's free from infringement.

The big takeaway here is that it's always a good idea to work with a trademark attorney to protect the intellectual property that you've worked so hard to establish. According to the Wall Street Journal, applicants are approximately 50% more likely to secure their trademark than people who file applications on their own. If your trademark application is rejected by the USPTO, you will need to revise and refile it, incurring additional filing fees. To avoid delays and extra costs, it is best to have a trademark lawyer help you get it right the first time.

Additional Benefits of Using a Trademark Attorney

Great trademark attorneys (like those you'll find at Sausser Summers, PC) will help with every step of filing and enforcing your trademark. Some additional benefits include the following:

Check to see if your proposed trademark is registered by another entity.

Conduct research to see if another business is using the trademark for which you're applying.

Provide advice and guidance on the strength of your trademark.

Draft and submit your trademark applications and application revisions.

Advice and guidance regarding trademark maintenance and protection.

Monitor the market for unauthorized use of your trademark.

Trademark enforcement to protect you against infringement.

 Online Trademark Lawyer Los Angeles, CA

Curious whether our trademark attorney services are right for you and your business? Contact Sausser Summer, PC, today. Let's talk about what you need, and how we can help.

What About Online Filing Services?

Online services, can provide you with basic assistance in filing your trademark. However, they will never be a legitimate substitute for an experienced trademark attorney helping clients in Los Angeles, CA.

 Trademark Attorney Los Angeles, CA

Although online filing services offer a step-by-step process, they take a one-size-fits-all approach to preparing legal documents. Even their advanced service only provides basic attorney assistance in completing your paperwork and helping with minor roadblocks. Online filing services' disclaimer highlights the many limitations of its services, including the fact that communications are not protected by attorney-client privilege. In addition, online filing services cannot provide advice, explanations, opinions, recommendations, or any kind of legal guidance on possible legal rights, remedies, defenses, options, selection of forms or strategies.

In other words, online filing services can offer you the necessary forms and point you in the right direction, but they cannot customize their services to your specific needs or help you with serious complications that may arise.

For the most comprehensive trademark service and protection, it's always wise to work with highly rated trademark lawyers, like you'll find at Sausser Summers, PC.

Understanding Trademarks Over Time

Trademarks in the U.S. can last indefinitely, but did you know that clients in Los Angeles, CA can file a trademark online, only to lose protection in some circumstances? Trademarks differ from patents and copyrights in that they do not have an expiration date. However, to prevent the cancellation of a trademark, you must maintain it. To ensure that your trademark remains protected, you must actively use it in commerce and renew it with the USPTO every ten years.

The Lanham Act tells us that "use in commerce" is the legitimate use of a trademark in the ordinary course of trade. In other words, you cannot register a trademark solely to reserve the rights to it in the future. In most cases, a trademark must be used continuously in connection with the goods or services it is registered for.

 Trademark Law Firm Los Angeles, CA

Steps to Renew Your Trademark

Trademarks are registered with the USPTO and generally need to be renewed every ten years. However, there is one crucial exception that you should be aware of. Within the first ten years of owning a trademark, you must file for renewal between the fifth and sixth year from the date of your initial registration.

During this renewal period, you are required to submit a Section 8 declaration, a specimen that shows how the mark is being used, and pay the required fee. You can also apply for Section 15 Incontestability status, which can strengthen your trademark rights. This application, although not mandatory, can make it harder for others to challenge your ownership of the mark.

After the first renewal, which falls between the fifth and sixth year of ownership, the next renewal filing is due between the ninth and tenth year, and then every tenth year thereafter. In the ninth year you will need to file a Section 8 declaration, attesting to your use of the mark or excusable nonuse. You've also got to file a Section 9 renewal application before the end of the tenth year to keep your registration active.

It is worth noting that the USPTO provides a six-month grace period if you fail to renew your mark within the required time frame, but it is best not to rely on it. If you don't file within the grace period time limits, the USPTO will cancel and expire your mark.

By hiring trademark attorneys helping clients in Los Angeles, CA, you can avoid the pitfalls and mistakes that can arise and cause you to lose your rights to the mark that represents it.

Losing Your Trademark Rights Through Abandonment

In the event that you stop using your trademark and have no plans to resume using it in commerce, it may be considered abandoned by the USPTO. This could result in the loss of your protective rights to the mark. Typically, a trademark is assumed to be abandoned if it has not been used for three years. However, you may be able to refute this presumption by providing evidence that you intend to use the mark again in the future.

Losing Your Trademark Rights Through Inappropriate Licensing

In addition to trademark abandonment, you should also be wary of improper licensing. It's important to remember that once you allow someone else to use your trademark, you must keep an eye on how they use it. You should monitor the products or services that feature your trademark to ensure that they meet consumers' expectations in terms of quality. Failure to do so can lead to a "naked" trademark license and the loss of your protective trademark rights.

How to Avoid Having to Refile Your Trademark

If you're wondering how you can avoid refiling your trademark, the answer is simple: file it correctly the first time around. Filing a trademark isn't inherently difficult, but when doing so, it's very important that certain aspects are filled out accurately in your application. If any information is missing or incorrect, the trademark application may be considered "void ab initio" or void from the beginning, requiring you to file again.

To avoid this, make sure that the information you provide in the application is accurate and complete, including the ownership of the trademark. For instance, if a corporation has multiple shareholders, it should not file under the President's personal name. The rightful owner should be the one/entity that ultimately controls the trademark and the associated goods/services.

It is also important to ensure that the goods and/or services description is precise. For example, if you sell electronic products, you should not file for research and development services despite having a research and development department. The goods/services description should reflect the goods/services you offer to customers, not the departments within your business.

Additionally, providing accurate dates of first use when filing for a trademark is crucial. The USPTO requires two dates to be specified - the date of first use anywhere and the date of first use in interstate commerce. Contact our trademark law office today to learn more about having accurate dates on your filing paperwork.

 Trademark Lawyer Los Angeles, CA
 Trademark Firm Los Angeles, CA

What Makes an Online Trademark Attorney Great?

At Sausser Summers, PC, we often get questions about how to distinguish run-of-the-mill consultants and others from great trademark attorneys. After all - when you're looking for an attorney to file or prosecute your business trademark, you should know their qualifications. Here are three ways you can separate the proverbial wheat from the chaff when it comes to trademark attorneys.

It's crucial to seek legal advice from a licensed trademark lawyer rather than relying on advice from non-professionals like trademark consultants. The USPTO even recommends hiring an attorney to help with the trademark process. Although trademark consultants may provide advice on trademark availability or name marketability, they cannot file the trademark for you or offer legal advice. According to the Rules of Practicing in trademark cases, "Individuals who are not attorneys are not recognized to practice before the Office in trademark matters." This rule applies to individuals who assist trademark applicants.

When searching for a trademark attorney, it's important to find someone with a strong background in trademark law. Look for an attorney who specializes in this area and has significant experience handling trademark-related cases. Avoid lawyers who don't have expertise in this field, as they may not be able to provide the guidance and support you need.

Ensure your attorney provides updates throughout the trademark registration process to avoid missing deadlines, including responding to any Office actions within six months. Failure to do so can result in trademark abandonment. The USPTO will only correspond with the listed attorney of record, so make sure your attorney keeps you informed.

In summary:

  • Be sure you're using a licensed trademark attorney helping clients in Los Angeles, CA.
  • It's best to work with a trademark lawyer who has years of experience filing trademarks.
  • Ensure that your trademark lawyer is willing to provide ongoing notifications relating to your trademark application process.
 Trademark Registration Lawyer Los Angeles, CA

Trademark Attorneys Working Hard for You

Building your brand and gaining recognition for it is a significant achievement, and it's important to protect it. However, there are certain pitfalls and mistakes that can arise, causing you to lose your rights to the mark that represents it. By working with knowledgeable trademark attorneys, you can avoid these issues and file your trademark successfully.

With an A+ rating from the Better Business Bureau (BBB), Sausser Summers, PC, offers comprehensive guidance, strategic advice, and reliable representation for a variety of trademark matters. Our attorneys have years of real-world experience and, having registered countless trademarks with the USPTO, provide our clients with individualized representation when they need it most.

If you're looking for skilled, adept, and experienced counsel, look no further than our trademark law firm. Contact us today to schedule your initial consultation and learn how we can help you safeguard your brand.

Latest News in Los Angeles, CA

‘The stress keeps you up at night’: Emotional devastation lingers in L.A. fire zones

March 9, 2025 3 AM PTFor weeks after the Eaton fire ravaged her Altadena home, Ivana Lin lived in a constant, overwhelming state of fight or flight.Her body was tense. She barely slept.At one point, she jotted down a to-do list of everything she felt pressure to get done in one day — including itemizing her lost belongings for her insurer, applying for financial assistance and figuring out child care for her 4-year-old son whose preschool burned.The list had 50 tasks.“The stress keeps you up at ...

March 9, 2025 3 AM PT

For weeks after the Eaton fire ravaged her Altadena home, Ivana Lin lived in a constant, overwhelming state of fight or flight.

Her body was tense. She barely slept.

At one point, she jotted down a to-do list of everything she felt pressure to get done in one day — including itemizing her lost belongings for her insurer, applying for financial assistance and figuring out child care for her 4-year-old son whose preschool burned.

The list had 50 tasks.

“The stress keeps you up at night,” said Lin, 38, who had lived with her husband in Altadena since 2017. “You feel like you’re never done. ... We wake up at 3 or 4 in the morning. Do as much as we can. Fall asleep around midnight.”

Chris Russo, who had closed escrow on a house in Pacific Palisades one day before the Palisades fire burned it down, said it has “been a full-time job to manage how to recover from this disaster.”

Russo, who had lived in West Hollywood for 24 years, thought she had found her paradise: a single-wide trailer in the Tahitian Terrace mobile home park across the street from Will Rogers State Beach.

“Honestly, it was magical,” she said. “Now, I have to pivot.”

A new poll of registered voters in Los Angeles County by the UC Berkeley Institute of Government Studies, and co-sponsored by the Times, found that the Jan. 7 fires had an enormous emotional toll on victims, who reported extreme levels of stress and dramatic changes in their day-to-day activities.

Asked to rank on a scale of one to 10 the level of additional stress the fires added to their lives, 84% of respondents in the Palisades fire zone and 77% in the Eaton fire zone gave the highest rankings, between eight and 10.

Significant portions of L.A. County residents outside the impacted areas were deeply impacted as well. Nearly a third reported high stress levels and 40% reported moderate stress.

Mark DiCamillo, director of the Berkeley IGS Poll, said for those in the affected areas, the tragedy “is probably going to be with them for many years whereas the rest of the county will move on and try to regain their lives.”

Residents in the burn areas were more likely than those outside it to be longtime residents to own their homes, and to be more satisfied with the quality of life in Greater Los Angeles.

Ninety-four percent of residents in the Eaton fire zone and 92% in the Palisades fire zone said they had lived in L.A. County for 11 or more years.

The survey found that the vast majority of residents in the burn areas expressed satisfaction with their neighborhoods. Yet roughly 40% have thought about leaving because of the fires — significantly more than county residents outside the burn areas.

People in the fire zones were “established residents of their communities,” DiCamillo said. “They’ve been there a long time. They tend to own their homes. They’re not a transient community. But they’ve had this tremendous disruption to their lives.”

“There’s kind of an interesting dichotomy,” he added. “They like L.A. more, but they’re more likely to be considering moving. It’s unfortunate.”

Lin, a poll respondent, said that although she and her husband plan to rebuild in Altadena and have been actively talking with architects, they did give some thought to leaving because the process of putting their lives back together has been so daunting.

“Even if people are like, ‘I really love Altadena,’ you have to really consider if you want to rebuild,” she said. “For me and many others, the fear was that this is going to take forever and we should leave. I don’t want to wait 10 years. And some people don’t have 10 years.”

Just after the fire, she and her son stayed with her in-laws in Dana Point, and her husband stayed with friends in Pasadena, closer to his workplace. With their family scattered and home gone, her son had “a cry I’ve never heard before — just so much anguish.”

They hurriedly rented an apartment in Pasadena in order to get their boy resettled as quickly as possible.

Lin has lived primarily in L.A. County since she and her family emigrated from Brazil when she was 12. She and her husband bought their home on Loma Alta Drive in 2017, the year they got married. The house was a total loss.

The poll indicated that 74% of respondents in the Eaton fire zone had structural damage to their homes or other properties owned by their immediate families. Among those who reported damage, nearly half said the structures were a total loss.

In the Palisades fire zone, 64% of respondents had structural damage to their homes or other properties. Among those, just over half experienced total losses.

Bradley Adams and his wife, Ester Song, also lost their Altadena home near Chaney Trail, at the base of the San Gabriel Mountains foothills.

After feeling deeply connected to Altadena, Adams said they have been unmoored for the last two months — staying occasionally with family in Long Beach, spending a few nights in Joshua Tree with their two excitable Husky mixes.

Adams, 34, said he has seriously considered leaving L.A. County because of the trauma of losing the house, which they bought in 2020. He avoids looking at photos of their prefire life — joyful scenes of cooking in the kitchen, playing games at the table, working in the garden.

“Throughout all of this, I want to be happy more than anything, and being in L.A. County right now is not making me happy,” he said. “We were so rooted in Altadena. We want to get rooted again. But we don’t want to put life on hold.”

Song, 36, said they plan to keep their Altadena property and rebuild a home on it — but that she liked the idea of being just outside the area, perhaps in a neighboring county, for the time being.

The couple own a small, downtown Los Angeles-based business, Road Runner bags, that makes bicycle bags and accessories. They lost a fleet of bicycles that they used to promote their products and worry about keeping their business afloat.

In the Eaton fire zone, according to the poll, 20% of residents were self-employed. Among those, 51% had damage to their business. In the Palisades fire zone, 36% were self-employed. Of those, 45% had damage to their business.

The poll showed that residents inside the fire zone supported increasing funding for city and county fire departments — even if it meant higher taxes — at a higher level than other county residents.

In the Palisades fire zone, 83% of respondents supported greater funding, as did 76% living in the Eaton fire zone. Outside the impacted areas, support fell to 64%.

The poll asked if insurance companies should be allowed to increase their rates for fire insurance if it enables them to offer coverage for everyone. That would include those in high-risk zones where homeowners have been dropped by their providers in recent years.

In the Palisades fire zone, 66% of respondents supported higher fees and broader coverage, as did 56% of respondents in the Eaton fire zone. Outside those areas, just 38% supported that choice.

Russo, a post-production supervisor and documentary filmmaker, said she was covered by the California FAIR Plan, the state’s insurer of last resort, and “severely underinsured.”

Russo said she has “a lot of confidence that the village of the Palisades will come back strong and beautiful,” though “it’s not going to be quick.”

She would like to see the mobile home park be rebuilt and actually get to move into her home, which was destroyed before she even received the key.

Russo, originally from New York, said she was “not in love with L.A., but I found this beautiful community and fell in love with the Palisades.”

But she said she needs to leave L.A. County, at least for now. She is planning to visit her mother in Florida and spend some time with friends on Cape Cod.

“I need a bit of a reset,” she said. “I need a different ocean view for a while. I need a place to heal.”

The Berkeley IGS poll was conducted online in English and Spanish from Feb. 17-26.

It surveyed 5,184 registered voters in Los Angeles County. The total included over-samples of 272 registered voters living in the Palisades fire zone and 293 registered voters living in the Eaton fire zone. The margin of error may be imprecise; however, the survey’s estimated margin of error for L.A. County voters is 2 percentage points, and the estimated margin of error for people living in the burn zones is 4 percentage points.

Can the Cooper Kupp and Rams Relationship Be saved?

The Los Angeles Rams and wide receiver Cooper Kupp will soon go their separate directions. The veteran wide receiver sounded off on his pending trade.In this story:The Los Angeles Rams and wide receiver Cooper Kupp are set to part ways this offseason. Kupp's production and contract have put the Rams in a challenging position, as they are set to pay Kupp handsomely this season.The veteran wide receiver was one of the team's most productive players during his eight seasons in Los Angeles. He has gone from one of the main p...

The Los Angeles Rams and wide receiver Cooper Kupp will soon go their separate directions. The veteran wide receiver sounded off on his pending trade.

In this story:

The Los Angeles Rams and wide receiver Cooper Kupp are set to part ways this offseason. Kupp's production and contract have put the Rams in a challenging position, as they are set to pay Kupp handsomely this season.

The veteran wide receiver was one of the team's most productive players during his eight seasons in Los Angeles. He has gone from one of the main pieces of a potent Rams offense to an afterthought seemingly overnight, as his Triple Crown season was not long ago.

Kupp noted that he does not want to leave Los Angeles and was even willing to renegotiate his contract in order to do so. However, Rams head coach Sean McVay made it clear the team planned to go in a different direction altogether, and part ways with Kupp.

“I asked if there were any other thoughts on ways to move forward, were there any other options to figure things out, and he said, ‘No, this is the way they wanted to go,'” Kupp said.

After receiving confirmation from McVay that there would be no reconciliation between them, Kupp made peace with the decision. Ever the professional, Kupp was determined not to let his time with the Rams end negatively after all they had been through together.

The question now is whether the relationship can be saved ahead of free agency's start this week. Kupp has been one of the Rams' top footsoldiers during the entire McVay era. He has been a pillar of the organization, a face of the offense, and a key piece of their DNA.

It now appears, though, that the two sides are beyond the reality of saving their working relationship. The NFL is a business, and even Kupp can't be saved from the hard truths that come with it.

Kupp's situation is a part of life in the National Football League, as many well-known but high-priced players have been traded or cut from their respective teams. It happens every offseason as stars age, their production declines, and teams move on.

Still, it is understandably difficult for a player to play for one team for nearly a decade, have the success Kupp and the Rams had together, and abruptly told things are ending.

Ensure you follow on X (Twitter) @RamsInsideronSI and @MNSToday and never miss another breaking news story again.

Please let us know your thoughts when you like our Facebook page WHEN YOU CLICK RIGHT HERE.

Published 18 Hours Ago

Small Earthquake Rumbles in Los Angeles Area

Residents of parts of Los Angeles County felt a minor earthquake centered west of Malibu, Calif., on Sunday afternoon. Preliminary estimates showed that the quake had a magnitude of 4.1, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.Within five minutes of the initial impact, aftershocks of magnitude 2.5, 3.0 and 2.8 rumbled in the area, the agency said.There were no immediate reports of damage or injuries. The Los Angeles Fire Department said the earthquake was not strong enough to have triggered an official earthquake response....

Residents of parts of Los Angeles County felt a minor earthquake centered west of Malibu, Calif., on Sunday afternoon. Preliminary estimates showed that the quake had a magnitude of 4.1, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.

Within five minutes of the initial impact, aftershocks of magnitude 2.5, 3.0 and 2.8 rumbled in the area, the agency said.

There were no immediate reports of damage or injuries. The Los Angeles Fire Department said the earthquake was not strong enough to have triggered an official earthquake response.

Still, many residents felt the mild shaking, even if they themselves were hardly rattled.

Alan Delarosa, 47, a manager at Geoffrey’s Malibu, an open-air restaurant overlooking the Pacific Ocean, was in an office when the quake occurred, shortly after 1 p.m. “I basically felt the room rocking back and forth,” he said.

The disturbance lasted about three seconds, he said. Once it was over, Mr. Delarosa rushed to check on his staff and guests, some of whom felt it. He was worried the gas line could have broken. But his kitchen staff didn’t even register the movement. The gas line was safe. There was no broken glass.

Amelia Goudzwaard, 23, had just arrived at Malibu Fitness when the earthquake hit. “I thought it could have been someone dropping weights,” she said. But the sustained shaking made her realize what was happening.

“The whole building was moving,” she said. But “it wasn’t so severe I thought — ‘Oh no, this could be the Big One.’”

The temblor struck during what experts say could be a period of increased seismic activity in the state, after decades of relative quiet. But its occurrence does not signal that a larger, catastrophic quake is any more likely.

Seismologists have long warned that an earthquake of that scale, the likes of which California has not experienced since 1906, could happen at any time. They have urged residents to prepare as much as possible by assembling emergency supplies and practicing “drop, cover and hold on” exercises with their children.

It has been three decades since a significant quake struck California.

The Loma Prieta earthquake, with a magnitude of 6.9, shook the Santa Cruz Mountains in 1989, leaving 63 people dead and more than 3,700 people injured.

A magnitude 6.7 quake in the Northridge neighborhood of Los Angeles in 1994 left 60 people dead, about 7,000 injured and more than 40,000 buildings damaged. The catastrophe also revealed a major defect in some steel-frame buildings, including many high rises, which under extreme shaking could collapse.

Ms. Gouzwaard, who was born and raised in Malibu, said she lost her house in 2018 during the Woolsey fire, which burned in the Santa Monica Mountains, and she is more sensitive these days to natural events affecting Southern California, particularly after floods and fire the past couple of years.

“I am starting to realize this is my new normal,” she said.

Jill Cowan and Thomas Fuller contributed reporting.

AEW Revolution Preview For Tonight’s Pay-Per-View In Los Angeles, CA. (3/9/2025)

It’s Sunday, and this week you know what that means …All Elite Wrestling returns live tonight for their AEW Revolution 2025 pay-per-view at the Crypto.com Arena in Los Angeles, California.Featured below is the complete lineup for the March 9, 2025 pay-per-view event:* AEW Champion Jon Moxley vs. Cope* Kyle Fletcher vs. Will Ospreay (Steel Cage Match)* AEW International Champion Konosuke Takeshita vs. Kenny Omega* TBS Champion Mercedes Mone vs. Momo Watanabe* AEW Women’s Champion Toni Storm vs. Mariah M...

It’s Sunday, and this week you know what that means …

All Elite Wrestling returns live tonight for their AEW Revolution 2025 pay-per-view at the Crypto.com Arena in Los Angeles, California.

Featured below is the complete lineup for the March 9, 2025 pay-per-view event:

* AEW Champion Jon Moxley vs. Cope* Kyle Fletcher vs. Will Ospreay (Steel Cage Match)* AEW International Champion Konosuke Takeshita vs. Kenny Omega* TBS Champion Mercedes Mone vs. Momo Watanabe* AEW Women’s Champion Toni Storm vs. Mariah May (Hollywood Ending)* AEW Tag Team Champions Bobby Lashley & Shelton Benjamin vs. The Outrunners* AEW Continental Champion Kazuchika Okada vs. Brody King* Swerve Strickland vs. Ricochet (AEW Title No. 1 Contendership)* MJF vs. Hangman Page* Big Boom A.J. & Mark Briscoe & Orange Cassidy vs. Johnny TV & MxM Collection (Zero Hour)* Lee Johnson & Blake Christian vs Komander & Hologram (Zero Hour)* ROH Champion Chris Jericho vs. Gravity (Zero Hour)* TNT Champion Daniel Garcia & Adam Cole & Roderick Strong & Kyle O’Reilly vs. Shane Taylor Promotions’ Shane Taylor & The Infantry & ROH Pure Champion Lee Moriarty (Zero Hour)

Make sure to join us here tonight for live AEW Revolution 2025 results coverage.

It's #AEWRevolution Day!

Don't miss a second of the action LIVE on PPV TONIGHT at 8ET/5PT!https://t.co/JlBXZPLNGj

????: Cable & Satellite????: @SportsOnPrime | @Triller_TV | @YouTube | @PPV_com ????: @DaveandBusters pic.twitter.com/fh8tXh7RHi

— All Elite Wrestling (@AEW) March 9, 2025

I can’t wait for #AEWRevolution tonight!

Thank you all who watch AEW!Don’t miss AEW Revolution, TONIGHT!

— Tony Khan (@TonyKhan) March 9, 2025

4.1 earthquake felt across Southern California, centered near Malibu

A magnitude 4.1 earthquake centered north of Malibu sent light and weak shaking across Southern California on Sunday.The strongest shaking was felt in parts of Malibu, Agoura Hills, Thousand Oaks and Camarillo, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. The strongest shaking was considered “light” as defined by the Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale — enough to rattle dishes and windows and feel like a truck has struck a building.Weak shaking may have been felt across a wider swath of the Southland, including dow...

A magnitude 4.1 earthquake centered north of Malibu sent light and weak shaking across Southern California on Sunday.

The strongest shaking was felt in parts of Malibu, Agoura Hills, Thousand Oaks and Camarillo, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. The strongest shaking was considered “light” as defined by the Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale — enough to rattle dishes and windows and feel like a truck has struck a building.

Weak shaking may have been felt across a wider swath of the Southland, including downtown Los Angeles, Long Beach, San Gabriel Valley, Santa Clarita Valley, Simi Valley, Oxnard and Ventura.

The earthquake hit on Sunday at 1:03 p.m. It was followed by a magnitude 2.5 jolt a minute later, and magnitude 3 and magnitude 2.8 aftershocks at 1:07 p.m.

There were no immediate reports of damage.

According to the USGS, the light quake was felt across the region, from south Goleta to Huntington Beach.

The epicenter was in the Santa Monica Mountains, about three miles northwest of El Matador State Beach and 3.5 miles northeast of Leo Carrillo State Beach. The epicenter was seven miles southwest of Thousand Oaks and Westlake Village.

In Westlake Village, people felt a roll and shake over about five seconds. Residents in Reseda felt a steady shake. In Redondo Beach, the shaking felt like a long rumble; in Windsor Hills, the quake felt like a long, slow roll. Someone in Torrance felt two jolts, and near Los Angeles International Airport, the earthquake felt like a brief sway.

One person in downtown L.A. described a long but gentle shake.

An official at L.A. County Fire Station 88 on Malibu Road said no reports of damage had come in, adding “the guys here didn’t even feel it.” An official at Fire Station 99 on Pacific Coast Highway said it was felt but the station got no reports about damage.

Southern California has been experiencing a number of moderate earthquakes since 2024. For all of 2024, Southern California had experienced 15 seismic sequences with at least one magnitude 4 or higher earthquake, according to the count of seismologist Lucy Jones, a Caltech research associate. That’s the highest annual total in the last 65 years, surpassing the 13 seen in 1988.

Sunday’s earthquake was the first magnitude 4 jolt for Southern California so far in 2025, Jones said Sunday.

Experts have cautioned for months that the latest quakes don’t provide any additional clarity on the timing of Southern California’s next devastating earthquake. “Seismologists have spent decades trying to read the tea leaves to look for patterns. The seismic network was installed in Southern California 100 years ago because scientists thought that small earthquakes would show patterns before the big earthquakes happened. And that just didn’t work out,” Susan Hough, seismologist for the U.S. Geological Survey, said a few months ago.

Jasmine Mendez contributed to this report.

Disclaimer:

This website publishes news articles that contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. The non-commercial use of these news articles for the purposes of local news reporting constitutes "Fair Use" of the copyrighted materials as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
 Trademark Legal Fees Los Angeles, CA
Serivce Areas