Online Trademark Attorneys
Sausser Summers, PC
- Lower Cost
- Faster Process
- Experienced Trademark Attorneys
File a Trademark for $399 + $250 Government Filing Fee
Trademark Attorney Working With Clients in San Jose, CA
If you're an entrepreneur, you know that protecting your intellectual property should be high on your list when it comes to safeguarding your company. However, as a successful business owner, you also know the steps and costs of filing a trademark in the U.S. can be expensive and arduous.
This conundrum can be even more overwhelming for new business owners who want to do everything possible to minimize the price of securing trademarks. They try to handle complicated tasks like trademark registration on their own, which can be a big mistake - especially when juggling the day-to-day tasks of running a business. You may be thinking, "But what about those set-it-and-forget-it services you can find online? All you have to do is plug in your info, and you're done." Using pre-made templates for trademark filing can be tempting, but doing so can leave you with inadequate protection and hurt you in the long run.
So, what is the easiest, most cost-effective route to consider that also minimizes legal risk? The truth is, before you spend money on an online filing service, it's best to consult with a trademark attorney working with clients in San Jose, CA.
At Sausser Summers, PC, our experienced trademark attorneys can help you understand the trademark process step by step. We can even help with U.S. trademark filing, U.S. trademark responses, and U.S. trademark renewals at a price you can actually afford. That way, you can make an informed decision regarding your business without having to break the bank.
- Trademark Attorney Working With Clients in San Jose, CA
- Sausser Summers, PC: Simplifying the U.S. Trademark Process
- Do I Really Need a Trademark Attorney for Protecting My Business in San Jose, CA?
- Additional Benefits of Using a Trademark Attorney
- What About Online Filing Services?
- Understanding Trademarks Over Time
- Steps to Renew Your Trademark
- Losing Your Trademark Rights Through Abandonment
- How to Avoid Having to Refile Your Trademark
- What Makes an Online Trademark Attorney Great?
- Trademark Attorneys Working Hard for You
Sausser Summers, PC: Simplifying the U.S. Trademark Process
Hiring an attorney can be a daunting task, but at Sausser Summers, PC, our goal is to make the process as simple and seamless as possible for you. That's why we offer a straightforward checkout service. First, you choose your flat fee trademark service and fill out a short questionnaire. Then, we will contact you within 24 hours to discuss the details of our service. From there, one of our experienced trademark attorneys will get to work on your behalf.
Using a trademark attorney for filing in San Jose, CA, can significantly increase your chances of a successful registration. The U.S. government recommends hiring a trademark attorney to help with your application, and our team of trademark lawyers is dedicated to meeting your needs. In fact, we help ensure your application is filed correctly the first time so you can get on with your life and avoid legal risks.
At Sausser Summers, PC, we work closely with our clients to understand their needs and provide them with sound professional advice. We never offer incomplete services, such as simply filing for registration, because that would leave you open to legal risks. You can rely on us to handle your intellectual property matters, and our flat fee services can help protect your business in a simple, straightforward, and affordable way. It's really that simple.
In terms of filing a U.S. trademark, we provide an easy three-step process to protect your intellectual property:
1. You provide your trademark info to our team via an online form.
2. Our team performs a comprehensive trademark search. This search ensures that no other marks will prevent you from registering your trademark in the U.S. Once performed, we'll send you a legal opinion letter that details our findings.
3. Sausser Summers, PC, files your U.S. trademark application. We are then listed as your Attorney of Record on file. From there, we'll provide ongoing updates regarding the status of your trademark as it works through the registration process.
The bottom line? At Sausser Summers, PC, we give both new and seasoned business owners an easy, efficient, cost-effective way to protect the one asset that sets them apart from others: their name.
The bottom line?
At Sausser Summers, PC, we give both new and seasoned business owners an easy, efficient, cost-effective way to protect the one asset that sets them apart from others: their name.
Do I Really Need a Trademark Attorney for Protecting My Business in San Jose, CA?
It's not necessary to be a lawyer in order to apply for a trademark. Anyone can submit a trademark application to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). However, registering a trademark involves more than just filling out a form. It's essential to conduct thorough research, accurately identify and clearly explain your trademark to ensure it receives adequate protection. And even after securing a trademark, you've got to monitor it consistently to make sure it's free from infringement.
The big takeaway here is that it's always a good idea to work with a trademark attorney to protect the intellectual property that you've worked so hard to establish. According to the Wall Street Journal, applicants are approximately 50% more likely to secure their trademark than people who file applications on their own. If your trademark application is rejected by the USPTO, you will need to revise and refile it, incurring additional filing fees. To avoid delays and extra costs, it is best to have a trademark lawyer help you get it right the first time.
Call
us (843) 654-0078Additional Benefits of Using a Trademark Attorney
Great trademark attorneys (like those you'll find at Sausser Summers, PC) will help with every step of filing and enforcing your trademark. Some additional benefits include the following:
Check to see if your proposed trademark is registered by another entity.
Conduct research to see if another business is using the trademark for which you're applying.
Provide advice and guidance on the strength of your trademark.
Draft and submit your trademark applications and application revisions.
Advice and guidance regarding trademark maintenance and protection.
Monitor the market for unauthorized use of your trademark.
Trademark enforcement to protect you against infringement.
Curious whether our trademark attorney services are right for you and your business? Contact Sausser Summer, PC, today. Let's talk about what you need, and how we can help.
What About Online Filing Services?
Online services, can provide you with basic assistance in filing your trademark. However, they will never be a legitimate substitute for an experienced trademark attorney helping clients in San Jose, CA.
Although online filing services offer a step-by-step process, they take a one-size-fits-all approach to preparing legal documents. Even their advanced service only provides basic attorney assistance in completing your paperwork and helping with minor roadblocks. Online filing services' disclaimer highlights the many limitations of its services, including the fact that communications are not protected by attorney-client privilege. In addition, online filing services cannot provide advice, explanations, opinions, recommendations, or any kind of legal guidance on possible legal rights, remedies, defenses, options, selection of forms or strategies.
In other words, online filing services can offer you the necessary forms and point you in the right direction, but they cannot customize their services to your specific needs or help you with serious complications that may arise.
For the most comprehensive trademark service and protection, it's always wise to work with highly rated trademark lawyers, like you'll find at Sausser Summers, PC.
Understanding Trademarks Over Time
Trademarks in the U.S. can last indefinitely, but did you know that clients in San Jose, CA can file a trademark online, only to lose protection in some circumstances? Trademarks differ from patents and copyrights in that they do not have an expiration date. However, to prevent the cancellation of a trademark, you must maintain it. To ensure that your trademark remains protected, you must actively use it in commerce and renew it with the USPTO every ten years.
The Lanham Act tells us that "use in commerce" is the legitimate use of a trademark in the ordinary course of trade. In other words, you cannot register a trademark solely to reserve the rights to it in the future. In most cases, a trademark must be used continuously in connection with the goods or services it is registered for.
Steps to Renew Your Trademark
Trademarks are registered with the USPTO and generally need to be renewed every ten years. However, there is one crucial exception that you should be aware of. Within the first ten years of owning a trademark, you must file for renewal between the fifth and sixth year from the date of your initial registration.
During this renewal period, you are required to submit a Section 8 declaration, a specimen that shows how the mark is being used, and pay the required fee. You can also apply for Section 15 Incontestability status, which can strengthen your trademark rights. This application, although not mandatory, can make it harder for others to challenge your ownership of the mark.
After the first renewal, which falls between the fifth and sixth year of ownership, the next renewal filing is due between the ninth and tenth year, and then every tenth year thereafter. In the ninth year you will need to file a Section 8 declaration, attesting to your use of the mark or excusable nonuse. You've also got to file a Section 9 renewal application before the end of the tenth year to keep your registration active.
It is worth noting that the USPTO provides a six-month grace period if you fail to renew your mark within the required time frame, but it is best not to rely on it. If you don't file within the grace period time limits, the USPTO will cancel and expire your mark.
By hiring trademark attorneys helping clients in San Jose, CA, you can avoid the pitfalls and mistakes that can arise and cause you to lose your rights to the mark that represents it.
Losing Your Trademark Rights Through Abandonment
In the event that you stop using your trademark and have no plans to resume using it in commerce, it may be considered abandoned by the USPTO. This could result in the loss of your protective rights to the mark. Typically, a trademark is assumed to be abandoned if it has not been used for three years. However, you may be able to refute this presumption by providing evidence that you intend to use the mark again in the future.
Losing Your Trademark Rights Through Inappropriate Licensing
In addition to trademark abandonment, you should also be wary of improper licensing. It's important to remember that once you allow someone else to use your trademark, you must keep an eye on how they use it. You should monitor the products or services that feature your trademark to ensure that they meet consumers' expectations in terms of quality. Failure to do so can lead to a "naked" trademark license and the loss of your protective trademark rights.
How to Avoid Having to Refile Your Trademark
If you're wondering how you can avoid refiling your trademark, the answer is simple: file it correctly the first time around. Filing a trademark isn't inherently difficult, but when doing so, it's very important that certain aspects are filled out accurately in your application. If any information is missing or incorrect, the trademark application may be considered "void ab initio" or void from the beginning, requiring you to file again.
To avoid this, make sure that the information you provide in the application is accurate and complete, including the ownership of the trademark. For instance, if a corporation has multiple shareholders, it should not file under the President's personal name. The rightful owner should be the one/entity that ultimately controls the trademark and the associated goods/services.
It is also important to ensure that the goods and/or services description is precise. For example, if you sell electronic products, you should not file for research and development services despite having a research and development department. The goods/services description should reflect the goods/services you offer to customers, not the departments within your business.
Additionally, providing accurate dates of first use when filing for a trademark is crucial. The USPTO requires two dates to be specified - the date of first use anywhere and the date of first use in interstate commerce. Contact our trademark law office today to learn more about having accurate dates on your filing paperwork.
What Makes an Online Trademark Attorney Great?
At Sausser Summers, PC, we often get questions about how to distinguish run-of-the-mill consultants and others from great trademark attorneys. After all - when you're looking for an attorney to file or prosecute your business trademark, you should know their qualifications. Here are three ways you can separate the proverbial wheat from the chaff when it comes to trademark attorneys.
It's crucial to seek legal advice from a licensed trademark lawyer rather than relying on advice from non-professionals like trademark consultants. The USPTO even recommends hiring an attorney to help with the trademark process. Although trademark consultants may provide advice on trademark availability or name marketability, they cannot file the trademark for you or offer legal advice. According to the Rules of Practicing in trademark cases, "Individuals who are not attorneys are not recognized to practice before the Office in trademark matters." This rule applies to individuals who assist trademark applicants.
When searching for a trademark attorney, it's important to find someone with a strong background in trademark law. Look for an attorney who specializes in this area and has significant experience handling trademark-related cases. Avoid lawyers who don't have expertise in this field, as they may not be able to provide the guidance and support you need.
Ensure your attorney provides updates throughout the trademark registration process to avoid missing deadlines, including responding to any Office actions within six months. Failure to do so can result in trademark abandonment. The USPTO will only correspond with the listed attorney of record, so make sure your attorney keeps you informed.
In summary:
- Be sure you're using a licensed trademark attorney helping clients in San Jose, CA.
- It's best to work with a trademark lawyer who has years of experience filing trademarks.
- Ensure that your trademark lawyer is willing to provide ongoing notifications relating to your trademark application process.
Trademark Attorneys Working Hard for You
Building your brand and gaining recognition for it is a significant achievement, and it's important to protect it. However, there are certain pitfalls and mistakes that can arise, causing you to lose your rights to the mark that represents it. By working with knowledgeable trademark attorneys, you can avoid these issues and file your trademark successfully.
With an A+ rating from the Better Business Bureau (BBB), Sausser Summers, PC, offers comprehensive guidance, strategic advice, and reliable representation for a variety of trademark matters. Our attorneys have years of real-world experience and, having registered countless trademarks with the USPTO, provide our clients with individualized representation when they need it most.
If you're looking for skilled, adept, and experienced counsel, look no further than our trademark law firm. Contact us today to schedule your initial consultation and learn how we can help you safeguard your brand.
Latest News in San Jose, CA
CA Withdraws New Clean-Air Rules Before Trump Can Reject Them
Alejandro Lazohttps://www.sanjoseinside.com/business/ca-withdraws-new-clean-air-rules-before-trump-can-reject-them/
California has decided to abandon its groundbreaking regulations phasing out diesel trucks and requiring cleaner locomotives because the incoming Trump administration is unlikely to allow the state to implement them.State officials have long considered the rules essential to cleaning up California’s severe air pollution and combating climate change.The withdrawal comes after the Biden administration recently approved the California Air Resources Board’s ...
California has decided to abandon its groundbreaking regulations phasing out diesel trucks and requiring cleaner locomotives because the incoming Trump administration is unlikely to allow the state to implement them.
State officials have long considered the rules essential to cleaning up California’s severe air pollution and combating climate change.
The withdrawal comes after the Biden administration recently approved the California Air Resources Board’s mandate phasing out new gas-powered cars, but had not yet approved waivers for four other standards for diesel vehicles that the state adopted.
President-elect Donald J. Trump has threatened to revoke or challenge all zero-emission vehicle rules and California’s other clean-air standards. By withdrawing its requests for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency approval, the Newsom administration is signaling a dramatic step back as the state recalibrates in anticipation of the new Trump era.
“California has withdrawn its pending waiver and authorization requests that U.S. EPA has not yet acted on,” Air Resources Board Chair Liane Randolph said in a statement. “While we are disappointed that U.S. EPA was unable to act on all the requests in time, the withdrawal is an important step given the uncertainty presented by the incoming administration that previously attacked California’s programs to protect public health and the climate and has said will continue to oppose those programs.”
Environmentalists were distressed, saying it puts communities at risk and dismantles key programs.
“To meet basic standards for healthy air, California has to shift to zero-emissions trucks and trains in the coming years. Diesel is one of the most dangerous kinds of air pollution for human health, and California’s diesel problem is big enough to cast its own shadow,” Paul Cort, director of the group Earthjustice’s Right To Zero campaign, said in a statement. “We’ll be working tirelessly in the coming years — and calling on Governor Newsom, state legislators, and our air quality regulators to join us — to clean up our freight system and fix the mess EPA’s inaction has created.”
California’s Advanced Clean Fleet rule, which phases out diesel trucks, was one of the most far-reaching and controversial rules that California has enacted in recent years to reduce air pollution and greenhouse gases. It would have ended the sale of new fossil-fuel trucks in 2036 and required large trucking companies to convert their medium and heavy-duty fleets to electric or hydrogen models by 2042.
The truck fleet rule, approved in 2022 after years of analysis, public hearings and discussions with industries and experts, was one of the most controversial and aggressive rules that the board has ever adopted. It would have ended diesel’s stronghold on goods movement in the state, with potentially profound effects on the state’s environment and economy.
Trucking companies had already sued the state to stop the rule, saying electric and hydrogen big rigs are not practical for many uses and that it would destroy the state’s economy.
“The California Trucking Association has consistently stated the Advanced Clean Fleets Rule was unachievable,” Eric Sauer, chief executive of the association, said in a statement. He said the industry would work with the state air board and EPA “to further reduce emissions in a technologically feasible and cost-effective manner. that preserves our State and the Nation’s critical supply chain.”
Diesel exhaust has been linked to cancer and contains fine particles that can trigger asthma and heart attacks as well as gases that form smog. Low-income, disadvantaged communities of color near ports, freeways and warehouses have long complained about noxious and dangerous diesel exhaust.
In addition, the state withdrew three other measures, including ones regulating emissions from diesel-powered locomotives, commercial harbor craft and refrigeration unit engines that are hauled by trucks and rail cars.
Under the locomotive rule, only locomotives less than 23 years old would have been allowed in California beginning in 2030, unless they were zero emissions. The rule also limited how long they could idle. People living in communities with trains and rail yards have long complained that the emissions are making them sick. Railroads said no zero-emission locomotive technology exists yet so the rule’s “timeline is impossible,” and that it would prematurely retire viable equipment and disrupt goods movement.
Under the Clean Air Act, Congress more than a half-century ago granted California the unique ability to set its own aggressive emission standards for cars, trucks and other vehicles because of its severe smog. But the federal EPA must grant California a waiver to implement them.
For decades, the EPA has granted California the waivers. Only one waiver was initially denied — a 2008 rule setting greenhouse gas emission standards for cars — and that decision was quickly reversed and the waiver granted.
But when Trump was last in office, his administration took aim at the state’s special status to enact stricter rules — one of the more significant environmental clashes of the first Trump era. The Biden administration in 2022 reversed those efforts.
California air-quality officials have been waiting for years for the Biden administration’s EPA to approve the last four rules, hoping that time wouldn’t run out. But the EPA failed to act in time.
Randolph told CalMatters that the EPA had informed California that it did not have time to complete the rules, prompting the air board to withdraw.
“Once we knew that, we realized that we needed to deploy an offensive strategy to make sure that we maintained control of the waivers, and so we pulled them back,” Randolph said. “The Trump administration has not indicated a lot of support for our clean air and climate strategy, right? So our concern was that if we leave them hanging out there, we don’t know what they’re going to do with them. So we thought it would be better to maintain control.”
What’s more, Randolph said litigation will be increasingly likely under the incoming Trump administration so it was time to “protect and defend the work that we’ve already done.”
“We know there’s going to be a lot of litigation in the offing, whether it’s entities suing us, or us going on the offense and trying to protect our ability to move forward to address both air quality and climate change,” she said.
California may have to rely instead on voluntary agreements with engine manufacturers, trucking companies and railroads.
“The California Air Resources Board is assessing its option to continue its progress as part of its commitment to move forward the important work of improving the state’s air quality and reducing harmful pollutants that contribute to poor health outcomes and worsen climate change,” Randolph said in the statement.
“It’s clear that the public health, air quality, and climate challenges that California faces require urgent action. We are ready and committed to continuing the important work of building a clean air future.”
The truck fleet rule would have affected about 1.8 million medium and heavy-duty trucks on California roads, including those used by FedEx, UPS and Amazon. The trucking industry had cited the high costs of zero-emission vehicles, limited charging and fueling infrastructure, and the financial burden on small operators.
The phased transition to zero-emission vehicles would have covered delivery vans such as UPS and FedEx trucks as well as big rigs. Some provisions, for drayage trucks that serve ports, were supposed to be implemented already, but the air board put them on hold pending the outcome of the Biden administration’s approval.
Some companies, including Pepsi, have already rolled out electric and hydrogen fleets. Amazon has deployed 50 heavy-duty electric trucks in Southern California as well as hundreds of electric vans nationally. Sales of zero-emissions trucks have increased despite no deadlines having kicked in. In 2023, one out of every six trucks sold in the state — more than 18,000 — were zero emissions.
Alejandro Lazo is a reporter with CalMatters.
The 25 Major U.S. Cities With the Largest Homeless Populations
Julia Haineshttps://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/slideshows/cities-with-the-largest-homeless-populations-in-the-u-s
Recent data points to a troubling rise in homelessness in the U.S., as 2024 marked a record high for the number of people who were without permanent shelter on a single night in 2024.The U.S. homeless population rose to more than 771,000 on a single night counted in late January 2024, according to the latest release of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Annual Homelessness A...
Recent data points to a troubling rise in homelessness in the U.S., as 2024 marked a record high for the number of people who were without permanent shelter on a single night in 2024.
The U.S. homeless population rose to more than 771,000 on a single night counted in late January 2024, according to the latest release of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Annual Homelessness Assessment Report. The number equates to an 18% increase over 2023’s total.
Nearly all populations experienced homelessness at record levels in 2024. The number of individuals who experienced chronic patterns of homelessness reached its highest level since data was first collected in 2007 at more than 152,000 in 2024.
Homelessness among people in families with children also reached a record-high level in 2024 at more than 259,000, up from 186,000 in 2023. The numbers of sheltered and unsheltered people experiencing homelessness also peaked at 497,256 and 274,224, respectively.
The number of unaccompanied youth – a group that includes individuals under the age of 18 and those between the ages of 18 and 24 years who are not part of a family with children or accompanied by a parent or guardian while being homeless – increased for a second straight year to 38,170 in 2024, a 10% increase over 2023.
READ:
States With the Most Homeless People
Children under the age of 18 had a larger single-year percentage rise in homelessness in 2024 than any other age group, increasing 32% from 2023. The increase contributed to young people making up a larger share of the homeless population, with individuals 24 and younger accounting for more than 1 of every 4 people experiencing homelessness in 2024.
As in previous years, the country’s major cities had the largest proportion of people experiencing homelessness in 2024 at 54%, compared with 24% who were counted in suburban areas and 16% who were living in largely rural areas.
Largely rural areas had the largest proportion of families with children who experienced unsheltered homelessness at 6%, compared with suburban and largely urban areas where 2% of homeless families with children were unsheltered.
The five cities with the largest homeless populations – New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Seattle and Denver – combined were home to more than one-third of all people in the U.S. who experienced homelessness in 2024.
Many of the 25 major U.S. cities with the highest rates of homelessness have seen their homeless populations grow. Eight of the top 25 cities are in California, with four in Texas also making the list.
According to data accompanying the Annual Homelessness Assessment Report, these are the 25 major U.S. cities with the largest homeless populations, based on the 2024 point-in-time estimates and the geographic area covered by a corresponding range of homelessness services. Estimates often include surrounding or nearby areas as well, and may at times only include sheltered people.
Next:25. Atlanta, Georgia
25. Atlanta, Georgia
Next:24. Austin, Texas
24. Austin, Texas
**2024 count only includes sheltered people, whereas 2023 included both sheltered and unsheltered people. Therefore, a change in homelessness compared to 2023 could not be calculated.
Next:23. Houston, Texas
23. Houston, Texas
Next:22. Long Beach, California
22. Long Beach, California
Next:21. San Antonio, Texas
21. San Antonio, Texas
Next:20. Dallas, Texas
7/28
Credit
(Getty Images)|
20. Dallas, Texas
Next:19. Miami, Florida
8/28
Credit
(Getty Images)|
19. Miami, Florida
Next:18. Minneapolis, Minnesota
18. Minneapolis, Minnesota
Next:17. Fresno, California
10/28
Credit
(Getty Images)|
17. Fresno, California
**2024 count only includes sheltered people, whereas 2023 included both sheltered and unsheltered people. Therefore, a change in homelessness compared to 2023 could not be calculated.
Next:16. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
11/28
Credit
(Getty Images)|
16. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Next:15. Washington, D.C.
15. Washington, D.C.
Next:14. Boston, Massachusetts
13/28
Credit
(Getty Images)|
14. Boston, Massachusetts
Next:13. Sacramento, California
14/28
Credit
(Getty Images)|
13. Sacramento, California
**2023 count only includes sheltered people, whereas 2024 included both sheltered and unsheltered people. Therefore, a change in homelessness from 2023 to 2024 could not be calculated.
Next:12. Portland, Oregon
15/28
Credit
(iStockPhoto)|
12. Portland, Oregon
**2024 count only includes sheltered people, whereas 2023 included both sheltered and unsheltered people. Therefore, a change in homelessness compared to 2023 could not be calculated.
Next:11. Las Vegas, Nevada
11. Las Vegas, Nevada
Next:10. San Francisco, California
10. San Francisco, California
**2023 count only included sheltered people, whereas the 2024 count included both sheltered and unsheltered people. Therefore, a change in homelessness from 2023 to 2024 could not be calculated.
Next:9. Phoenix, Arizona
9. Phoenix, Arizona
Next:8. Oakland, California
8. Oakland, California
**2023 count only includes sheltered people, whereas 2024 included both sheltered and unsheltered people. Therefore, a change in homelessness from 2023 to 2024 could not be calculated.
Next:7. San Jose, California
7. San Jose, California
**2024 count only includes sheltered people, whereas 2023 included both sheltered and unsheltered people. Therefore, a change in homelessness compared to 2023 could not be calculated.
Next:6. San Diego, California
6. San Diego, California
Next:5. Denver, Colorado
5. Denver, Colorado
Next:4. Seattle, Washington
23/28
Credit
(Getty Images)|
4. Seattle, Washington
Next:3. Chicago, Illinois
3. Chicago, Illinois
*Chicago had the fastest-growing homeless population between 2023 and 2024 of all areas on this list.
Next:2. Los Angeles, California
2. Los Angeles, California
Next:1. New York, New York
1. New York, New York
Next:The 25 Major U.S. Cities With the Largest Homeless Populations
27/28
Credit
(Mario Tama|Getty Images)
1. New York City, New York 2. Los Angeles, California 3. Chicago, Illinois 4. Seattle, Washington 5. Denver, Colorado 6. San Diego, California 7. San Jose, California 8. Oakland, California 9. Phoenix, Arizona 10. San Francisco, California 11. Las Vegas, Nevada 12. Portland, Oregon 13. Sacramento, California 14. Boston, Massachusetts 15. Washington D.C. 16. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 17. Fresno, California 18. Minneapolis, Minnesota 19. Miami, Florida 20. Dallas, Texas 21. San Antonio, Texas 22. Long Beach, California 23. Houston, Texas 24. Austin, Texas 25. Atlanta, Georgia
San Jose starts ban on RV street parking
Joyce Chuhttps://sanjosespotlight.com/san-jose-starts-ban-on-rv-street-parking/
San Jose has begun temporarily banning RVs in designated areas across the city this week.Under a $3.3 million pilot program, Oversized and Lived-In Vehicle Enforcement (OLIVE), the city has chosen 30 temporary tow-away zones to clear RVs for street sweeping and cle...
San Jose has begun temporarily banning RVs in designated areas across the city this week.
Under a $3.3 million pilot program, Oversized and Lived-In Vehicle Enforcement (OLIVE), the city has chosen 30 temporary tow-away zones to clear RVs for street sweeping and cleanup throughout this year. It will establish a new temporary tow-away zone every week. Chynoweth Avenue is the first site that will temporarily ban RVs, effective this week, where there are 19 RVs and lived-in vehicles. Next week will be Boynton Avenue from Underwood Drive to Blackford Avenue, where there are four RVs parked. A temporary RV ban at Columbus Park, where approximately 55 vehicles are parked, is scheduled for December.
“The neighbors and small business owners and people coming to the parks in these areas deserve some relief,” San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan said at the Thursday news conference held at Chynoweth Park.
After testing the program, the city will chose up to 10 sites where RVs and lived-in vehicles will be permanently banned.
Once a tow-away site is established, city workers will post signs and then begin enforcement one or two weeks later. Restrictions will remain in place for about a month in each location until all vehicles are moved and the street is cleaned. The city is also scheduled to open a safe parking site in Berryessa next month. Until then, individuals forced to move have no options. Those who have inoperable vehicles are at risk of getting towed once the city begins enforcing the temporary ban.
“It’s like a cat and mouse, you know?” Paul Peterson, who lives in an RV parked on Chynoweth Avenue, told San José Spotlight. “Now we’re gonna go … find (another) place to park.”
The Berryessa safe parking site will be able to hold up to 85 vehicles, but people living in their RVs are worried there won’t be enough room for all of them once the city begins towing. There are an estimated 1,000 lived-in vehicles throughout the city.
“It is really deplorable when our city is abating RV unhoused folks to move with no place to go,” homeless advocate Gail Osmer told San José Spotlight. “They move back and forth, from one place to another and get kicked out of where they are. Each (council district) should have a safe RV site.”
The Berryessa safe parking site is part of the city’s plan to add 1,500 temporary beds for homeless residents in the next 18 months. That also includes expanding the city’s tiny home villages and converting hotels into temporary housing.
The city will target areas close to schools, waterways, tiny home sites and parks, as well as areas with large concentrations of lived-in vehicles.
“I think it’s a good thing,” Tami Simons, who lives across from Chynoweth Park and near the RV encampment, told San José Spotlight. “There’s been nothing but trash, debris, noise, lots of junk. I’m really pleased to see this happening.”
Contact Joyce Chu at [email protected] or @joyce_speaks on X.
WWE Raw Preview For Tonight’s Show In San Jose, CA. (1/13/2025)
Matt Boonehttps://wrestlingheadlines.com/wwe-raw-preview-for-tonights-show-in-san-jose-ca-1-13-2025/
The road to WWE Royal Rumble 2025 continues tonight in “The Capital of Silicon Valley.”WWE Raw returns tonight at 8/7c with the sophomore episode on Netflix, live from the SAP Center in San Jose, California.Featured below is the advertised lineup heading into the January 13, 2025 episode of the three-hour WWE on Netflix red brand program:* CM Punk to appear* GUNTHER to appear* Rhea Ripley to appear* Sheamus vs. Ludwig Kaiser* Chad Gable vs. Mystery Luchador* Street Fight: Damian Priest vs. Finn Balor* WWE Wom...
The road to WWE Royal Rumble 2025 continues tonight in “The Capital of Silicon Valley.”
WWE Raw returns tonight at 8/7c with the sophomore episode on Netflix, live from the SAP Center in San Jose, California.
Featured below is the advertised lineup heading into the January 13, 2025 episode of the three-hour WWE on Netflix red brand program:
* CM Punk to appear* GUNTHER to appear* Rhea Ripley to appear* Sheamus vs. Ludwig Kaiser* Chad Gable vs. Mystery Luchador* Street Fight: Damian Priest vs. Finn Balor* WWE Women’s Intercontinental Championship: Dakota Kai vs. Lyra Valkyria
Make sure to join us here tonight at 8/7c for live WWE Raw on Netflix results coverage from San Jose, CA.
We've got ourselves a STREET FIGHT tomorrow night on #RawOnNetflix!
???? SAN JOSE????️ https://t.co/7WyGr3n7s9▶️ https://t.co/RqCV6U4uqR pic.twitter.com/cCcusUgkWf
— WWE (@WWE) January 13, 2025
Who ya got when @WWESheamus faces @wwe_kaiser tomorrow night on #RawOnNetflix?
???? SAN JOSE????️ https://t.co/7WyGr3n7s9▶️ https://t.co/RqCV6U4uqR pic.twitter.com/oD0e7rhrg0
— WWE (@WWE) January 13, 2025
Who is the mystery opponent for @WWEGable tomorrow night on #RawOnNetflix?
???? SAN JOSE????️ https://t.co/7WyGr3mzCB▶️ https://t.co/RqCV6U3WBj pic.twitter.com/rLbycEfFjV
— WWE (@WWE) January 12, 2025
Who will become the first-ever Women's Intercontinental Champion tomorrow night on #RawOnNetflix when @Real_Valkyria faces @ImKingKota?
???? SAN JOSE????️ https://t.co/7WyGr3mzCB▶️ https://t.co/RqCV6U3WBj pic.twitter.com/gqONhnuSLm
— WWE (@WWE) January 12, 2025
World Heavyweight Champion @Gunther_AUT will be on #RawOnNetflix tomorrow night!
???? SAN JOSE????️ https://t.co/7WyGr3mzCB▶️ https://t.co/RqCV6U3WBj pic.twitter.com/4DN6tbyfnk
— WWE (@WWE) January 12, 2025
The NEW Women's World Champion @RheaRipley_WWE arrives on #RawOnNetflix tomorrow night!
???? SAN JOSE????️ https://t.co/7WyGr3n7s9▶️ https://t.co/RqCV6U4uqR pic.twitter.com/DXIBgCv9tI
— WWE (@WWE) January 12, 2025
What will @CMPunk have in store for #RawOnNetflix tomorrow night?
???? SAN JOSE????️ https://t.co/7WyGr3mzCB▶️ https://t.co/RqCV6U3WBj pic.twitter.com/wdUwSBwAwn
— WWE (@WWE) January 12, 2025
Disclaimer:
